Contrarian Investor UK invests mainly in UK FTSE and AIM listed shares. Like famous contrarians, Warren Buffett and Anthony Bolton, he likes to take a different view to the crowd of investors. He prefers the short term, possibly speculative trade, to the long term hold and takes the view that it's about "buy and research" not "buy and hold"! This blog tracks Contrarian Investor UK's thoughts on the stockmarket and his portfolio's trades. Move against the herd with the Contrarian Investor UK!
Trades and observations from a British contrarian stock investor
This blog is not intended to give financial advice. Before investing, do your own research and consult your financial adviser if appropriate. The accuracy of any information included is not guaranteed and may be subject to conjecture or interpretation by Contrarian Investor. Therefore visitors should validate all facts using alternative sources where possible.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
8% fall in GW Pharma is buy back opportunity
I have just bought back the GW Pharma position sold on Monday given the current 10p drop in the share price, presumably on a market maker "tree shake" prior to the AGM.
GW Pharma falls ahead of AGM
GW Pharmaceuticals (GWP) Annual General Meeting is being held today at 11am. The shares are currently down 4p to 119p to sell after slipping significanly in the final hours of trading yesterday. I have been selling down some of my holding over the last 2 days following the news on Sativex UK/Spain registration and the Phase IIb cancer study, meaning my position has been reduced by around two-thirds. I am continuing to hold a core position and may look to top up on any weakness but given the interim results are not due until May when further may be forthcoming on the Sativex approval process in Europe, these shares may drift a little unless a major new institution comes on board. A buy back point below 120 p looks enticing.
U.K. budget today at 12.30pm and political rant
So Alistair Darling gets on his feet for the U.K. budget at 12.30 GMT, the last budget before the General Election in May or June this year. It is not expected to offer much in addition to the pre-budget statement from November but politically Darling will attempt to give the message that Labour is managing the British economy out of recession in a sustainable way, whilst the Conservatives are being too aggressive in focusing on deficit reduction too early (the U.K. deficit is around 12% of spend) . In the last few weeks, this difference between the political parties has been exploited to paint David Cameron's Conservatives as a party of cutting. Prime Minister, Gordon Brown's, message seems to be working as the latest opinion poll puts the Conservatives on only a 5 point lead over Labour which would lead to a Hung parliament at the election. Many votes don't want to hear the message of austerity - "let them cut something as long as it doesn't affect me!". This worries economists because it may mean that lack of full control in Parliament may mean that deficit reduction plans are not agreed putting the U.K.'s Triple A credit rating at threat. On the other hand, it could be argued that if a pact is made between one of the major parties and the Liberal Democrats, fiscal deficit reduction could be even more aggressive as the Lib Dems are stated that they too are aligned to cutting the deficit.
Any moves by Darling on a new tax on the banking system will be keenly watched but he has already stated that he will not move with international cooperation. In contrast, the Conservatives seem to be focused on introducing the tax with or without this international agreement. Sweden have already introduced such a tax. It would be a popular move to adopt such as tax and a vote winner.
Both major political parties in the U.K. have not strayed from the message that they will not cut front line services. But the difficulty is there to see, a large budget deficit and growing debt that needs to be dealt with. Taxing the banks and high earners is a popular move but likely to lead to a "brain drain" to more welcoming taxation environments such as Switzerland. Increasing taxation is only likely to stifle wealth creation in the longer term. Cuts in big spending departments such as social security and health seem to be the logical solution, but for both the Labour and Conservative governments this is politically unpalatable even though both leaders know it is necessary. Whether Brown and Cameron say once thing during the election and act differently once they are in No.10 Downing Street is a possibility since any risk to the AAA credit rating would be political suicide. It would be refreshing if politicians acknowledged that there is no magic bullet. The U.K. must get the budget under control without putting the economy back into the recession. Rather than increasing taxes, cuts in big ticket departments such as Health must be on the agenda. U.K. voters have to understand they can't have it both ways i.e. strong public services and low taxes. I am not aligned to either of the major parties, but I am increasingly frustrated that the reality of the situation is unwilling to be accepted by the electorate.
Any moves by Darling on a new tax on the banking system will be keenly watched but he has already stated that he will not move with international cooperation. In contrast, the Conservatives seem to be focused on introducing the tax with or without this international agreement. Sweden have already introduced such a tax. It would be a popular move to adopt such as tax and a vote winner.
Both major political parties in the U.K. have not strayed from the message that they will not cut front line services. But the difficulty is there to see, a large budget deficit and growing debt that needs to be dealt with. Taxing the banks and high earners is a popular move but likely to lead to a "brain drain" to more welcoming taxation environments such as Switzerland. Increasing taxation is only likely to stifle wealth creation in the longer term. Cuts in big spending departments such as social security and health seem to be the logical solution, but for both the Labour and Conservative governments this is politically unpalatable even though both leaders know it is necessary. Whether Brown and Cameron say once thing during the election and act differently once they are in No.10 Downing Street is a possibility since any risk to the AAA credit rating would be political suicide. It would be refreshing if politicians acknowledged that there is no magic bullet. The U.K. must get the budget under control without putting the economy back into the recession. Rather than increasing taxes, cuts in big ticket departments such as Health must be on the agenda. U.K. voters have to understand they can't have it both ways i.e. strong public services and low taxes. I am not aligned to either of the major parties, but I am increasingly frustrated that the reality of the situation is unwilling to be accepted by the electorate.
Labels:
alistair darling,
conservatives,
deficit,
labour,
uk budget
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)