Trades and observations from a British contrarian stock investor

This blog is not intended to give financial advice. Before investing, do your own research and consult your financial adviser if appropriate. The accuracy of any information included is not guaranteed and may be subject to conjecture or interpretation by Contrarian Investor. Therefore visitors should validate all facts using alternative sources where possible.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

Political heat rises as Falkland Oil drilling finally starts

Desire Petroleum’s Ocean Guardian Rig finally started drilling in the North Falklands basin last Monday and it only served to bolster Argentinian efforts further to use political pressure to try and disrupt the drilling campaign, but these efforts are considered by many commentators as being unlikely to succeed.

After the disastrous war with the U.K. over the sovereignty of the Falkland Island (Malvinas) in 1982 started by Argentinian president, General Galtieri, things have been relatively quiet in the South Atlantic for the last 28 years. The islands were discovered by the British in 1592, permanently occupied in 1833 and for the last 100 years Argentina has contested ownership of the Islands with the British.

Argentina’s President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s has undertaken an anti-corporate campaign of significant proportions, with her latest move being to try to collect more than $6.5 billion in currency reserves to pay down debt and breath live into the flagging economy, after a move to privatise private pensions in 2008. An unpopular fight with farmers over export taxes has made her and her party postions weak in elections due in 2011. Desire Petroleum’s move to drill in the Falklands has been met with much vitriole. The first step was discourage ships sailing to the Falklands by requiring them to get permits if they pass through Argentinean waters - the Falkland Oil drillers have said this will have little impact on the drilling campaign. The Argentine foreign minister, Jorge Taiana, met with Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. secretary general, last week to pressurise the U.N. to agree with the assertion that Britain should be forced to acknowledge sovereignty claims. Taiana also argued that the U.K. does not have the right to exploit resources in the Falklands without first obtaining approval from Argentina.

At the Rio, Latin America summit this week, Hugo Chávez pledged his country's military support for a Falklands war. However, a military move against the U.K. would be suicidal from a political and economic perspective and it would be surprising if the Argentine government is even close to considering this despite the rhetoric in Rio.

If Desire do strike any significant oil during March, then the heat coming from Argentina can only get worse, even if military action is highly unlikely after the disastrous 1982 attack on the Islands. For De Kirchner’s government, added pressure on the U.N. and other organisations about sovereignity is highly popular in her country and it would be a tough sell indeed to her electorate if Desire or any other of the Falklands drillers (Rockhopper Exploration, Falklands Oil and Gas, or Borders and Southern ) “strike it rich” and Argentina was seen to be doing nothing as the U.K. collected the wealth from this "Argentine asset of right". Next year's Presidential election makes the Falklands an easy diversion to the country's own economic problems, just as Galtieri used the Islands back in the 1980's to cover similar but much more serious issues.


For shareholders such as myself, the politics have made it a nervous week on the markets for the Falklands Oil drillers. Despite the Ocean Guardian Rig spud on Monday, share prices have moved down as political risk has clouded the opportunity and talk of a military strike on the rig by Argentinian jet fighters has made investors question the risk/reward of the Falklands drillers. I for one took the opportunity to increase my holding in Desire Petroleum as the rumours rose later in the week. There is significant risk of course, but it is more of a no oil show than a pre-emptive attack by the Argentinian Navy.